As discussed in my other posts on age certificate the BBFC
control anything that is allowed or suitable to be produced and viewed in the
United Kingdom. They are the general commanders or head inspectors of the
British film industry in terms of handing out age certificates and deciding
whether a film should be banned, cut or censored. Their known role is to
protect the viewing public from any offensive material or anything that could
cause harm to society, such as the visible promotion of drugs. BBFC are important
in terms of providing safety and protection to a massive audience and
protecting those from viewing something so bad it may have the power to
psychologically distort and mess them up.
The type of material that gets censored is things that show
reference to extreme violence, religious offending, extreme brutality, demoting
of women, graphic scenes of sexual assault unless portrayed in a way to show
the consequences after, political controversies, extreme torture, promotion of
drugs and alcohol, practical and moral messages such as carrying a gun is a
good thing, and using a child as such a brutal antagonist like in the movie Mikey
can be something censored by the BBFC due to the age of the child and the
nature of his actions like killing an elder with a blunt object is something
that the audience would not like to see. Also a movie like Scum was banned and
edited several times as it contained scenes of gang rape and suicide, and also
had graphic scenes of savage brutality in which the victim does not have the power to fight back so
they’re just literally beat the hell out of, which is the sort of material that
needs to be banned as it can temporarily or permanently damage a viewer
psychologically.
Another banned movie is The Bunny Game, made in 2010
considered as torture porn, with the narrative a cocaine addicted
prostitute who in turn is abducted by a mad male truck driver and then
tortured, other reasons why this was banned was down to it having repeated
dialogue, lack of plot, and no evident characterization.
The difference between films being cut and banned is clear,
when a film is banned it cannot be released or distributed to the audience as
it has been entirely stripped off publishing rights due to its nature and
material, however when a film is cut it means that the producer has a chance to
remove any scenes that the BBFC do not like or would not allow them to release
if it remains, allowing for the film to have less scenes that could harm the
viewer psychologically. An example of a film being given the chance to cut some
scenes is the controversial ‘A Serbian Film’. On 25 August, the BBFC handed the
film's distributor with a list of things that needed to be removed. As it says on their site, ‘49 individual
cuts were required, across 11 scenes’ in total. They claim that around 'three minutes 48 seconds' of the film would need to be removed and although this
may seem like a contently large number of cuts at first, many of the cuts made in
the film were small parts.

An example of a film that was banned entirely is ‘Women In
Cellblock 9’, this remains banned in the United Kingdom due to its large
amounts of sexual violence, and one of the lead actresses in many of the sex
scenes was 16 at the time the film was made. The film upon release was rejected
by the BBFC when it was submitted and still has not been successfully
appealed to be shown to viewers. This could be down to the fact that the
actress in a lead role was 16 at the time and they used her in many unusual
scenes for a girl of her in any period of time.
The debate for censorship still rattles on and is a
debatable topic; the two different sides are Forna (for censorship) and Kemode
(against censorship). Forna is for censorship and believe that films with
unsuitable material should be censored due to the psychological effect it could
have on a viewer and topics such as sexism would be considered very oppressing
and controversial if a film was released demoting women as a whole or they
released film about 9/11 which could cause society to have second thoughts on
who to blame and may have an impact on modern lives, mixed with my opinion I am
TeamForna and I believe that films should be censored as I would not like to
enter a cinema with the worry that there is a mad man dressed up as Jason with
a chainsaw or massive machete in his bag ready to slaughter anyone, nobody
wants that worry. Reports in the news arose over a man, dressed as a character
from the box office hit The Dark Knight Rises, shooting at the audience during
a film in the cinema, it is generally common of shootings like this is in
modern day now as there are no real laws imposed on weapons. Everyone wants a
weapon now after watching all these uncensored movies. Kemode on the other hand
is against censorship which may be down to the fact that people have an
interest in the things they show and instead this material should be shown as
audiences have a free choice to go and watch these things, they are not forced.
Linking in with my opinion I understand this side of the debate as take me for
example I can watch a movie like Kidulthood and not want to pick up a gun and
use it as a means of defence or watch Human Centipede and not want to capture
people off the street and attach their mouths to their face, you can say that
films can be censored because it may harm the audience but at the same time
they have that choice to go and watch these things no one forced them, it may
be certain individuals that are affected by this, there are people in mental and
psychiatric asylums for a reason yet there are others like me that can watch
graphic movies as such and not want to make it happen in reality, as I’ve said,
it is all down to personal choice and freedom.
Conclusion
From researching censorship I have a basic and mature idea
of what to include in my opening and what may be suitable for an audience.
Since I won’t consider myself as a troubled person and someone who takes
interest into these weird and graphic ideas and motifs, my opening will be
fairly simple something that can enter the BBFC and come out rated 15. From my
research I have a basic idea of what to include in my opening and because of my
research I can always go back and look at what to improve.
Proficient response to the task. You comment on who the BBFC are and provide their role in the industry in terms of censorship they provide for an audience. Some good films drawn upon to support your ideas.
ReplyDeleteTo improve;
-although you provide some opinion on the Forna and Kemode debate, be clearer to who you side with
-provide some images to support your work (also include sub-headings for clarity)
-provide examples of thriller that have been cut and banned